[from "Taste of Chicago Buddhism" July 2018]
In the adaptation of Buddhism from Asia in the West, one thing that has gotten lost is the sense of community. I can’t speak for other Asian ethnicities, but I’m trying to understand why so many Japanese Americans, most of whom identify as Buddhist, are against social justice issues. I can’t get into their heads but I can talk about why the presentation of Buddhism in North America has given rationalization for dismissing all marginalized persons as freeloaders and criminals.
In the adaptation of Buddhism from Asia in the West, one thing that has gotten lost is the sense of community. I can’t speak for other Asian ethnicities, but I’m trying to understand why so many Japanese Americans, most of whom identify as Buddhist, are against social justice issues. I can’t get into their heads but I can talk about why the presentation of Buddhism in North America has given rationalization for dismissing all marginalized persons as freeloaders and criminals.
Back in Japan, people identified with their communities.
Villagers and farmers were expected to help each other – caring for the sick,
contributing labor for their neighbors’ harvests, repairing roads together
after natural disasters. In many ways the modern Japanese government has
included these community concerns in its programs such as national health care
and infrastructure maintenance (however, they haven’t done a thorough job of
meeting the needs of the 2011 tsunami victims). For the first waves of immigrants
from Japan to the United States, there was a sense of banding together for
mutual aid societies (primarily to share the costs of burial as people died in
the U.S. far away from their families). But from early on, they were under the
weight of assimilation – “You people better do things like regular Americans
and give up your uncivilized customs.” Our temple like so many others still
follows the “church” format for Sunday services which was set up to seem as Western
as possible – using readings and songs based on Christian models. So for
Japanese American Buddhists, the message was: Act as much as you can like White
Anglo-Saxon Protestants and you’ll be considered worthy to be in this country.
Becoming like WASPs also meant one follows the WASP disdain for
those who don’t fit the majority’s image of “true American” – the blacks whose
ancestors where forcibly brought to the U.S. as slaves, the indigenous peoples,
the Catholics from Ireland and Italy, and the Jews. When the Japanese Americans
were interned during World War II, it didn’t make them identify more with
oppressed people, but rather made them feel indignant, “We’ve been trying to be
good Americans (i.e. like white people as much as we could), so why lock us
up?”
When I went to assist Rev. Gyoko Saito at the Los Angeles
Higashi Honganji after my three years of study in Japan, I saw the disconnect
between the teachings of hongan (all
beings are taken up in the aspiration for oneness) and how the Japanese
Americans thought. In the 1980s, the influence of Cesar Chavez and United Farm
Workers movement was still strong in California, but the L.A. members who owned
large farms said, “I take care of my Mexican workers – they get food and a roof
over their heads. Why should they get more than we had in camp?” It showed that
the Japanese Americans thought they were “tough” for having survived the
internment camps and the migrant workers were “weak” for wanting more than
shacks to sleep in.
In Chicago after the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks,
many Japanese Americans were swayed by the xenophobic view of Muslims. To try
to offset this, I scheduled a guest speaker from the Muslim community to speak
at our Sunday service. He spoke about the humanitarian concerns in both
Buddhism and Islam, but unfortunately he got questions such as, “If you guys
have all the oil, why do you attack us?”
Even as recently as our 2017 interfaith service when we had
American Islamic College professor Shabana Mir as our guest speaker, members
were telling me, “Make sure she doesn’t say anything political.” She gave a
brilliant talk that diffused a lot of tension with humor but still I get push
back about me doing “too much” for “those Muslims,” hearing that they all
support terrorism and should be banned from our country.
[Activist Ryan Yokota at the June 30 rally against immigrant
family separation. Regrettably I had to tell him that our temple could not be
one of the sponsors of the Japanese American contingent.]
As much as I criticize the elites who dominate the Western
Buddhist groups, it’s many of the Japanese American temple members who believe
in what I call “Ayn Rand” Buddhism – “What I own is karmic reward for my own
hard work. Why should I share with those lazy blacks/immigrants/homeless etc.?”
Too much of the Buddhism in our Japanese American temples talks of personal
responsibility and karmic reward/punishment – blaming the poor and
disadvantaged for bringing on their own suffering due to their bad choices
instead of recognizing our participation in a system that limits their
opportunities.
I know what I need to do (before it’s too late health- and
career-wise) is speak more about the essence (shinshu) of the Buddhist teachings of liberation from our
self-serving ego, awakening to the reality of our lives intertwined with all
lives. It’s not some abstract concept but as I’ve experienced – we become truly
alive when we go into action together with others. It makes more sense that as
Buddhists who respect the worth of all beings, Japanese Americans would be
involved in the struggles of those who feel marginalized, instead of identifying
so strongly with the privileged who want us to act like them and abandon our
Asian heritage.